Guam vs Singapore: Primary energy from nuclear
Guam
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Guam rank
32nd
Singapore rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Guam
- Singapore
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 32nd and Singapore ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Guam or Singapore?
- Guam, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Guam and Singapore?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Singapore?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Singapore rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Guam ranks 32nd and Singapore ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.