Hong Kong vs Namibia: Primary energy from nuclear
Hong Kong
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Namibia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
32nd
Namibia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Hong Kong
- Namibia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Namibia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Hong Kong or Namibia?
- Hong Kong, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong and Namibia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Hong Kong ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.