Iceland vs Mali: Primary energy from nuclear
Iceland
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Mali
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Iceland rank
32nd
Mali rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Iceland
- Mali
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Mali, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Iceland or Mali?
- Iceland, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Iceland and Mali?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mali?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Mali rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Iceland ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.