Kiribati vs Macao: Primary energy from nuclear
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Macao
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
32nd
Macao rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Kiribati
- Macao
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 32nd and Macao ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Kiribati or Macao?
- Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Kiribati and Macao?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Macao?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Macao rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Kiribati ranks 32nd and Macao ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.