Kiribati vs Malaysia: Primary energy from nuclear
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Malaysia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Kiribati rank
32nd
Malaysia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Kiribati
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Malaysia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 32nd and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Kiribati or Malaysia?
- Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Kiribati and Malaysia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malaysia?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Malaysia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Kiribati ranks 32nd and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.