North Korea vs Namibia: Primary energy from nuclear
North Korea
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Namibia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
North Korea rank
32nd
Namibia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- North Korea
- Namibia
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Namibia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
North Korea ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, North Korea or Namibia?
- North Korea, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between North Korea and Namibia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do North Korea and Namibia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- North Korea ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.