Latvia vs Western Sahara: Primary energy from nuclear
Latvia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Western Sahara
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Latvia rank
33rd
Western Sahara rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Latvia
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Western Sahara, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 33rd and Western Sahara ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Latvia or Western Sahara?
- Latvia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Latvia and Western Sahara?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Western Sahara?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Western Sahara rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Latvia ranks 33rd and Western Sahara ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.