Malawi vs New Caledonia: Primary energy from nuclear
Malawi
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Malawi rank
32nd
New Caledonia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Malawi
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 32nd and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Malawi or New Caledonia?
- Malawi, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Malawi and New Caledonia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and New Caledonia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and New Caledonia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Malawi ranks 32nd and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.