MNE vs ZWE: Primary energy from nuclear
MNE
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
ZWE
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
MNE rank
32nd
ZWE rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- MNE
- ZWE
How they compare
MNE currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in ZWE, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 19 years both countries report, ZWE has been ahead every year.
MNE ranks 32nd and ZWE ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MNE | ZWE | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, MNE or ZWE?
- MNE, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in ZWE as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between MNE and ZWE?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with MNE ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MNE and ZWE?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do MNE and ZWE rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- MNE ranks 32nd and ZWE ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.