Nauru vs Sudan: Primary energy from nuclear
Nauru
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Nauru rank
32nd
Sudan rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Nauru
- Sudan
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 32nd and Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Nauru or Sudan?
- Nauru, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Nauru and Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sudan?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Sudan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Nauru ranks 32nd and Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.