Nauru vs Zambia: Primary energy from nuclear
Nauru
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Nauru rank
32nd
Zambia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Nauru
- Zambia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Nauru or Zambia?
- Nauru, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Nauru and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zambia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Zambia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Nauru ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.