New Caledonia vs Saint Helena: Primary energy from nuclear
New Caledonia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Saint Helena
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
32nd
Saint Helena rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- New Caledonia
- Saint Helena
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Saint Helena, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Saint Helena has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Saint Helena ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, New Caledonia or Saint Helena?
- New Caledonia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Saint Helena as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between New Caledonia and Saint Helena?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saint Helena?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Saint Helena rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Saint Helena ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.