New Caledonia vs Singapore: Primary energy from nuclear
New Caledonia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
33rd
Singapore rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- New Caledonia
- Singapore
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, New Caledonia or Singapore?
- New Caledonia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between New Caledonia and Singapore?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Singapore?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do New Caledonia and Singapore rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- New Caledonia ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.