New Caledonia vs Zambia: Primary energy from nuclear
New Caledonia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
32nd
Zambia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- New Caledonia
- Zambia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, New Caledonia or Zambia?
- New Caledonia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between New Caledonia and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zambia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do New Caledonia and Zambia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- New Caledonia ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.