Niger vs Serbia: Primary energy from nuclear
Niger
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Serbia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Niger rank
32nd
Serbia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Niger
- Serbia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Niger ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Niger or Serbia?
- Niger, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Niger and Serbia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Niger ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.