Philippines vs Serbia: Primary energy from nuclear
Philippines
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Serbia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Philippines rank
32nd
Serbia rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Philippines or Serbia?
- Philippines, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Philippines ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.