Saint Helena vs Sudan: Primary energy from nuclear
Saint Helena
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Saint Helena rank
32nd
Sudan rank
32nd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Saint Helena
- Sudan
How they compare
Saint Helena currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Saint Helena ranks 32nd and Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Helena | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Saint Helena or Sudan?
- Saint Helena, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Saint Helena and Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Saint Helena ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Helena and Sudan?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Saint Helena and Sudan rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Saint Helena ranks 32nd and Sudan ranks 32nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.