Singapore vs Saint Lucia: Primary energy from nuclear
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Saint Lucia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Singapore rank
33rd
Saint Lucia rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Singapore
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 33rd and Saint Lucia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Singapore or Saint Lucia?
- Singapore, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Lucia?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and Saint Lucia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Singapore ranks 33rd and Saint Lucia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.