Singapore vs Zambia: Primary energy from nuclear
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Singapore rank
33rd
Zambia rank
33rd
Primary energy from nuclear over time
- Singapore
- Zambia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from nuclear, Singapore or Zambia?
- Singapore, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary energy from nuclear between Singapore and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zambia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Zambia rank globally for primary energy from nuclear?
- Singapore ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.