Norway vs South Sudan: Primary energy use, annual growth rate
Norway
2.48 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Sudan
2.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Norway rank
89th
South Sudan rank
87th
Primary energy use, annual growth rate over time
- Norway
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.52 % change on previous year against 2.48 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Sudan ahead.
Norway ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 217 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.5543 % change on previous year | 3.79 % change on previous year | 4.35 % change on previous year | South Sudan |
| 2020s | -0.0149 % change on previous year | -0.1009 % change on previous year | 0.086 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy use, annual growth rate, Norway or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.52 % change on previous year against 2.48 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy use, annual growth rate between Norway and South Sudan?
- 0.04 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Norway and South Sudan rank globally for primary energy use, annual growth rate?
- Norway ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Primary energy use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.