Cayman Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
0.0146 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
0.0195 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
19th
United Arab Emirates rank
16th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • United Arab Emirates
00.0050.010.0150.02196519942023

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.0195 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0146 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0049 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.3 times Cayman Islands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 19th and United Arab Emirates ranks 16th of 204 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0025 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0029 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
1990s 0.0055 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0065 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2000s 0.0095 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.01 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2010s 0.0112 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0048 terawatt-hours per square kilometre United Arab Emirates
2020s 0.0129 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0178 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0049 terawatt-hours per square kilometre United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 0.0195 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0146 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and United Arab Emirates?
0.0049 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and United Arab Emirates?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and United Arab Emirates rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 19th and United Arab Emirates ranks 16th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/cayman-islands/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/cayman-islands/united-arab-emirates/">Cayman Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.