Malaysia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Malaysia
0.0039 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
44th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Malaysia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.0010.0020.0030.004196519942023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0039 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 44th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 204 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0034 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0033 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0037 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0042 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Malaysia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0044 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0039 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Malaysia ranks 44th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/malaysia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/malaysia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Malaysia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.