Qatar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Qatar
0.0531 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
6th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
9th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Qatar
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.020.040.06196519942023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0531 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0211 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.7 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Qatar ranks 6th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0073 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0069 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0105 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0088 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0056 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0113 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0056 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0113 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0171 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0059 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0182 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0345 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0163 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0441 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0421 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0019 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 0.0487 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0331 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0156 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Qatar or Trinidad and Tobago?
Qatar, at 0.0531 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.032 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Qatar and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0211 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Trinidad and Tobago?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Qatar ranks 6th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/qatar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre-2/qatar/trinidad-and-tobago/">Qatar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.