Aruba vs Tokelau: Renewable electricity generating capacity per capita

Aruba
415.09
in 2023
Tokelau
440.55
in 2023
Aruba rank
74th
Tokelau rank
71st

Renewable electricity generating capacity per capita over time

  • Aruba
  • Tokelau
0200400600200020112023

How they compare

Tokelau currently reports 440.55 against 415.09 in Aruba, a difference of 25.46.

That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tokelau ahead.

Aruba ranks 74th and Tokelau ranks 71st of 219 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Tokelau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Tokelau Difference Ahead
2000s 30.29 12.48 17.81 Aruba
2010s 352.12 455.8 103.68 Tokelau
2020s 416.13 469.21 53.08 Tokelau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable electricity generating capacity per capita, Aruba or Tokelau?
Tokelau, at 440.55 against 415.09 in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in renewable electricity generating capacity per capita between Aruba and Tokelau?
25.46, with Tokelau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Tokelau?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Tokelau rank globally for renewable electricity generating capacity per capita?
Aruba ranks 74th and Tokelau ranks 71st of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Renewable electricity generating capacity per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable electricity generating capacity per capita
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
219 places, 5,256 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed