Bhutan vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Bhutan
99,883 cubic meters
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
78,505 cubic meters
in 2022
Bhutan rank
4th
Papua New Guinea rank
5th

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bhutan
  • Papua New Guinea
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 99,883 cubic meters against 78,505 cubic meters in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 21,378 cubic meters.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 364,367 cubic meters 358,649 cubic meters 5,718 cubic meters Bhutan
1970s 265,423 cubic meters 288,840 cubic meters 23,417 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
1980s 190,847 cubic meters 233,010 cubic meters 42,163 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
1990s 152,305 cubic meters 176,539 cubic meters 24,234 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
2000s 122,008 cubic meters 125,303 cubic meters 3,296 cubic meters Papua New Guinea
2010s 106,147 cubic meters 93,330 cubic meters 12,817 cubic meters Bhutan
2020s 100,590 cubic meters 80,035 cubic meters 20,555 cubic meters Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Bhutan or Papua New Guinea?
Bhutan, at 99,883 cubic meters against 78,505 cubic meters in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Bhutan and Papua New Guinea?
21,378 cubic meters, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Papua New Guinea?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Papua New Guinea ranks 5th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bhutan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bhutan/papua-new-guinea/">Bhutan vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.