Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,077 cubic meters
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea
14,416 cubic meters
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Equatorial Guinea
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119912022

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 14,416 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3,339 cubic meters.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 183 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 8,979 cubic meters 44,773 cubic meters 35,795 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2000s 8,696 cubic meters 28,944 cubic meters 20,248 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2010s 10,002 cubic meters 18,421 cubic meters 8,418 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2020s 10,926 cubic meters 14,782 cubic meters 3,856 cubic meters Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 14,416 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
3,339 cubic meters, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.