Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,077 cubic meters
in 2022
Guinea
16,080 cubic meters
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st
Guinea rank
38th

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Guinea
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 16,080 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 5,003 cubic meters.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Guinea ranks 38th of 183 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 8,979 cubic meters 29,746 cubic meters 20,767 cubic meters Guinea
2000s 8,696 cubic meters 24,663 cubic meters 15,966 cubic meters Guinea
2010s 10,002 cubic meters 19,483 cubic meters 9,481 cubic meters Guinea
2020s 10,926 cubic meters 16,488 cubic meters 5,563 cubic meters Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guinea?
Guinea, at 16,080 cubic meters against 11,077 cubic meters in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea?
5,003 cubic meters, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Guinea ranks 38th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.