Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Madagascar: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Bosnia and Herzegovina
11,077 cubic meters
in 2022
Madagascar
11,072 cubic meters
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st
Madagascar rank
42nd

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Madagascar
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119912022

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 11,077 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar, a difference of 5 cubic meters.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Madagascar ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Madagascar Difference Ahead
1990s 8,979 cubic meters 23,640 cubic meters 14,662 cubic meters Madagascar
2000s 8,696 cubic meters 17,915 cubic meters 9,219 cubic meters Madagascar
2010s 10,002 cubic meters 13,485 cubic meters 3,483 cubic meters Madagascar
2020s 10,926 cubic meters 11,354 cubic meters 428.17 cubic meters Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Madagascar?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 11,077 cubic meters against 11,072 cubic meters in Madagascar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Madagascar?
5 cubic meters, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Madagascar?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Madagascar rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st and Madagascar ranks 42nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Madagascar: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/bosnia-and-herzegovina/madagascar/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Madagascar: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.