Hungary vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Hungary
624.67 cubic meters
in 2022
South Africa
718.2 cubic meters
in 2022
Hungary rank
148th
South Africa rank
145th

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Hungary
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 718.2 cubic meters against 624.67 cubic meters in Hungary, a difference of 93.53 cubic meters.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 148th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 590.89 cubic meters 2,353 cubic meters 1,762 cubic meters South Africa
1970s 570.48 cubic meters 1,776 cubic meters 1,206 cubic meters South Africa
1980s 563.63 cubic meters 1,310 cubic meters 746.71 cubic meters South Africa
1990s 581.11 cubic meters 1,019 cubic meters 437.89 cubic meters South Africa
2000s 593.68 cubic meters 909.33 cubic meters 315.66 cubic meters South Africa
2010s 610.54 cubic meters 802.5 cubic meters 191.96 cubic meters South Africa
2020s 622.7 cubic meters 728.78 cubic meters 106.08 cubic meters South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Hungary or South Africa?
South Africa, at 718.2 cubic meters against 624.67 cubic meters in Hungary as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Hungary and South Africa?
93.53 cubic meters, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and South Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Hungary and South Africa rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Hungary ranks 148th and South Africa ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/hungary/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/hungary/south-africa/">Hungary vs South Africa: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.