South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

South Africa
718.2 cubic meters
in 2022
Zimbabwe
762.96 cubic meters
in 2022
South Africa rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k196119912022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 762.96 cubic meters against 718.2 cubic meters in South Africa, a difference of 44.76 cubic meters.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,353 cubic meters 2,759 cubic meters 406.22 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1970s 1,776 cubic meters 2,064 cubic meters 287.79 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1980s 1,310 cubic meters 1,454 cubic meters 143.88 cubic meters Zimbabwe
1990s 1,019 cubic meters 1,118 cubic meters 99.16 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2000s 909.33 cubic meters 985.17 cubic meters 75.83 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2010s 802.5 cubic meters 858.18 cubic meters 55.68 cubic meters Zimbabwe
2020s 728.78 cubic meters 776.21 cubic meters 47.43 cubic meters Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 762.96 cubic meters against 718.2 cubic meters in South Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
44.76 cubic meters, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
South Africa ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.