Turkmenistan vs Palestine, State of: Renewable freshwater resources per capita

Turkmenistan
194.32 cubic meters
in 2022
Palestine, State of
164.95 cubic meters
in 2021
Turkmenistan rank
166th
Palestine, State of rank
167th

Renewable freshwater resources per capita over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Palestine, State of
0100200300400199020062022

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 194.32 cubic meters against 164.95 cubic meters in Palestine, State of, a difference of 29.37 cubic meters.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Palestine, State of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 166th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 183 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 333.24 cubic meters 324.59 cubic meters 8.65 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2000s 281.35 cubic meters 248.25 cubic meters 33.1 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2010s 228.99 cubic meters 193.07 cubic meters 35.91 cubic meters Turkmenistan
2020s 200.13 cubic meters 167 cubic meters 33.13 cubic meters Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable freshwater resources per capita, Turkmenistan or Palestine, State of?
Turkmenistan, at 194.32 cubic meters against 164.95 cubic meters in Palestine, State of as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable freshwater resources per capita between Turkmenistan and Palestine, State of?
29.37 cubic meters, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Palestine, State of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Turkmenistan and Palestine, State of rank globally for renewable freshwater resources per capita?
Turkmenistan ranks 166th and Palestine, State of ranks 167th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Palestine, State of: Renewable freshwater resources per capita. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/turkmenistan/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-water-resources-per-capita/turkmenistan/west-bank-and-gaza/">Turkmenistan vs Palestine, State of: Renewable freshwater resources per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable freshwater resources per capita
Unit
cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 10,438 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.