Macao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita
Macao
38.49
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
37.77
in 2023
Macao rank
23rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
26th
Share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita over time
- Macao
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Macao currently reports 38.49 against 37.77 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.72.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Macao ranks 23rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 26th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 6 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.11 | 26.22 | 1.11 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1970s | 30.55 | 27.73 | 2.82 | Macao |
| 1980s | 33.51 | 29.14 | 4.36 | Macao |
| 1990s | 38.56 | 29.02 | 9.54 | Macao |
| 2000s | 38.92 | 29.87 | 9.05 | Macao |
| 2010s | 40.31 | 33.19 | 7.12 | Macao |
| 2020s | 37.77 | 36.51 | 1.26 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita, Macao or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Macao, at 38.49 against 37.77 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita between Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.72, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Macao and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita?
- Macao ranks 23rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 26th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of dietary energy supply from fats vs gdp per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.