Botswana vs Serbia: Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita
Botswana
50 percent
in 2021
Serbia
49 percent
in 2021
Botswana rank
64th
Serbia rank
67th
Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita over time
- Botswana
- Serbia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 50 percent against 49 percent in Serbia, a difference of 1 percent.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 67th of 182 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.75 percent | 38.5 percent | 11.25 percent | Botswana |
| 2010s | 48.6 percent | 46.8 percent | 1.8 percent | Botswana |
| 2020s | 49.5 percent | 49 percent | 0.5 percent | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita, Botswana or Serbia?
- Botswana, at 50 percent against 49 percent in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita between Botswana and Serbia?
- 1 percent, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Serbia rank globally for share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita?
- Botswana ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 67th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A high share of calories from cereals, roots and tubers typically represents lower dietary diversity. GDP per capita is adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs between countries.