Eswatini vs Haiti: Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita
Eswatini
56 percent
in 2021
Haiti
55 percent
in 2021
Eswatini rank
42nd
Haiti rank
44th
Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Haiti
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 56 percent against 55 percent in Haiti, a difference of 1 percent.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 42nd and Haiti ranks 44th of 182 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.33 percent | 54.11 percent | 1.22 percent | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 53.6 percent | 51.2 percent | 2.4 percent | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 56 percent | 54.5 percent | 1.5 percent | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita, Eswatini or Haiti?
- Eswatini, at 56 percent against 55 percent in Haiti as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita between Eswatini and Haiti?
- 1 percent, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Haiti?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Haiti rank globally for share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 42nd and Haiti ranks 44th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A high share of calories from cereals, roots and tubers typically represents lower dietary diversity. GDP per capita is adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs between countries.