Belarus vs Kiribati: Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing
Belarus
7.6%
in 2023
Kiribati
8.2%
in 2023
Belarus rank
13th
Kiribati rank
10th
Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing over time
- Belarus
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 8.2% against 7.6% in Belarus, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Kiribati ranks 10th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.5% | 2.7% | 3.9% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 7.5% | 0.8% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 7.3% | 8.2% | 0.9% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing, Belarus or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 8.2% against 7.6% in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing between Belarus and Kiribati?
- 0.6%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Kiribati ranks 10th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy consumed by agriculture, forestry and fishing as a percentage of total final energy consumption.