Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing
Greenland
22.3%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
18.9%
in 2023
Greenland rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
6th
Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing over time
- Greenland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 22.3% against 18.9% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.1% | 8.5% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 13.2% | 9.4% | 3.9% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 18.3% | 8.3% | 10.0% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 23.1% | 13.9% | 9.1% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
- Greenland, at 22.3% against 18.9% in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
- 3.4%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing?
- Greenland ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy consumed by agriculture, forestry and fishing as a percentage of total final energy consumption.