Iceland vs Kiribati: Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing
Iceland
12.0%
in 2023
Kiribati
8.2%
in 2023
Iceland rank
7th
Kiribati rank
10th
Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing over time
- Iceland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 12.0% against 8.2% in Kiribati, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Kiribati's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 7th and Kiribati ranks 10th of 175 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.6% | 2.7% | 12.9% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 9.5% | 7.5% | 2.0% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 11.1% | 8.2% | 2.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing, Iceland or Kiribati?
- Iceland, at 12.0% against 8.2% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing between Iceland and Kiribati?
- 3.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing?
- Iceland ranks 7th and Kiribati ranks 10th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy consumed by agriculture, forestry and fishing as a percentage of total final energy consumption.