South Africa vs South Sudan: Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing
South Africa
3.1%
in 2023
South Sudan
3.2%
in 2023
South Africa rank
60th
South Sudan rank
57th
Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing over time
- South Africa
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 3.2% against 3.1% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 57th of 175 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.5% | 3.2% | 1.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 3.5% | 3.5% | 0.0% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing, South Africa or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 3.2% against 3.1% in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing between South Africa and South Sudan?
- 0.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and South Sudan rank globally for share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing?
- South Africa ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 57th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of energy used in agriculture, forestry and fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy consumed by agriculture, forestry and fishing as a percentage of total final energy consumption.