Chile vs Nauru: Share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use
Chile
100.0%
in 2023
Nauru
100.0%
in 2023
Chile rank
1st
Nauru rank
1st
Share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use over time
- Chile
- Nauru
How they compare
Chile currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Nauru, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.4% | 99.2% | 3.8% | Nauru |
| 2000s | 98.2% | 99.1% | 1.0% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 99.8% | 99.5% | 0.3% | Chile |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use, Chile or Nauru?
- Chile, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use between Chile and Nauru?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nauru?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Nauru rank globally for share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use?
- Chile ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data compiled from multiple sources by the World Bank – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share with access to electricity vs. per capita energy use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Access to electricity means having an electricity source that can provide very basic lighting, and charge a phone or power a radio for 4 hours per day.