Congo vs Kiribati: Electricity generation from solar and wind
Congo
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Congo rank
161st
Kiribati rank
161st
Electricity generation from solar and wind over time
- Congo
- Kiribati
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 161st and Kiribati ranks 161st of 212 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0.001 terawatt-hours | 0.001 terawatt-hours | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.004 terawatt-hours | 0.01 terawatt-hours | 0.006 terawatt-hours | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from solar and wind, Congo or Kiribati?
- Congo, at 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from solar and wind between Congo and Kiribati?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kiribati?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Kiribati rank globally for electricity generation from solar and wind?
- Congo ranks 161st and Kiribati ranks 161st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Pinto et al. (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from solar and wind. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.