Aruba vs Congo: Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables
Aruba
0.0%
in 2024
Congo
0.0%
in 2024
Aruba rank
32nd
Congo rank
32nd
Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables over time
- Aruba
- Congo
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 32nd and Congo ranks 32nd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables, Aruba or Congo?
- Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables between Aruba and Congo?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Congo?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Congo rank globally for primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables?
- Aruba ranks 32nd and Congo ranks 32nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured as a percentage of total energy supply.