Kiribati vs Samoa: Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2024
Samoa
0.0%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
33rd
Samoa rank
33rd
Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 33rd and Samoa ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Kiribati, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables?
- Kiribati ranks 33rd and Samoa ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured as a percentage of total energy supply.