Malta vs Namibia: Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables
Malta
0.0%
in 2024
Namibia
0.0%
in 2024
Malta rank
32nd
Namibia rank
32nd
Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables between Malta and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables?
- Malta ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured as a percentage of total energy supply.