Namibia vs Singapore: Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables
Namibia
0.0%
in 2024
Singapore
0.0%
in 2025
Namibia rank
33rd
Singapore rank
33rd
Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables over time
- Namibia
- Singapore
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables, Namibia or Singapore?
- Namibia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables between Namibia and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables?
- Namibia ranks 33rd and Singapore ranks 33rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured as a percentage of total energy supply.