Brazil vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita

Brazil
0.0054 units per person
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0052 units per person
in 2022
Brazil rank
101st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
104th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita over time

  • Brazil
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0050.010.015196019912022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0054 units per person against 0.0052 units per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 101st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0044 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.0044 units per person Brazil
1970s 0.0089 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.0088 units per person Brazil
1980s 0.0093 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.0093 units per person Brazil
1990s 0.0098 units per person 0.0028 units per person 0.007 units per person Brazil
2000s 0.0088 units per person 0.009 units per person 0.0001 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0075 units per person 0.0072 units per person 0.0003 units per person Brazil
2020s 0.0056 units per person 0.0053 units per person 0.0004 units per person Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita, Brazil or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Brazil, at 0.0054 units per person against 0.0052 units per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita between Brazil and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0002 units per person, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita?
Brazil ranks 101st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-capita/brazil/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-capita/brazil/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Brazil vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 13,011 data points, 1960–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.