Finland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita

Finland
0.0052 units per person
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0052 units per person
in 2022
Finland rank
105th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
104th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita over time

  • Finland
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.15196019912022

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0052 units per person against 0.0052 units per person in Finland, a difference of 0 units per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 105th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0451 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.0451 units per person Finland
1970s 0.0778 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.0778 units per person Finland
1980s 0.1113 units per person 0.0001 units per person 0.1113 units per person Finland
1990s 0.0317 units per person 0.0028 units per person 0.0289 units per person Finland
2000s 0.0209 units per person 0.009 units per person 0.012 units per person Finland
2010s 0.0104 units per person 0.0072 units per person 0.0032 units per person Finland
2020s 0.0052 units per person 0.0053 units per person 0.0001 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita, Finland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0052 units per person against 0.0052 units per person in Finland as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita between Finland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 units per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2022.
How do Finland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita?
Finland ranks 105th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-capita/finland/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-capita/finland/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Finland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 13,011 data points, 1960–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.