Aruba vs Curacao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Aruba
138.94 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Curacao
124.58 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Aruba rank
4th
Curacao rank
5th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Curacao
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 138.94 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curacao, a difference of 14.36 units per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Curacao's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 4th and Curacao ranks 5th of 207 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Curacao Difference Ahead
2010s 462.91 units per square kilometre 404.41 units per square kilometre 58.5 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 115.88 units per square kilometre 107.44 units per square kilometre 8.44 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Aruba or Curacao?
Aruba, at 138.94 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curacao as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Aruba and Curacao?
14.36 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Curacao?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Aruba and Curacao rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 4th and Curacao ranks 5th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Curacao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/curacao/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/curacao/">Aruba vs Curacao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.