Aruba vs Gibraltar: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Aruba
138.94 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Gibraltar
7,637 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Aruba rank
4th
Gibraltar rank
1st

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Gibraltar
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119912022

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 7,637 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 7,498 units per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 55.0 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 4th and Gibraltar ranks 1st of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Gibraltar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Gibraltar Difference Ahead
1960s 2,837 units per square kilometre 36.64 units per square kilometre 2,801 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3,222 units per square kilometre 6,244 units per square kilometre 3,023 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 1,996 units per square kilometre 8,310 units per square kilometre 6,314 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 1,597 units per square kilometre 11,021 units per square kilometre 9,423 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 1,643 units per square kilometre 19,291 units per square kilometre 17,649 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 436.09 units per square kilometre 18,849 units per square kilometre 18,413 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 115.88 units per square kilometre 6,811 units per square kilometre 6,695 units per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Aruba or Gibraltar?
Gibraltar, at 7,637 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Aruba and Gibraltar?
7,498 units per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Gibraltar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Aruba and Gibraltar rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 4th and Gibraltar ranks 1st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Gibraltar: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/gibraltar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/gibraltar/">Aruba vs Gibraltar: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.