Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Aruba
138.94 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China
164.28 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Aruba rank
4th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 164.28 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 25.34 units per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 207 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and Hong Kong, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,837 units per square kilometre | 16.01 units per square kilometre | 2,821 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1970s | 3,222 units per square kilometre | 75.36 units per square kilometre | 3,146 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 1,996 units per square kilometre | 133.46 units per square kilometre | 1,863 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1990s | 1,597 units per square kilometre | 209.1 units per square kilometre | 1,388 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2000s | 1,643 units per square kilometre | 340.17 units per square kilometre | 1,302 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2010s | 436.09 units per square kilometre | 469.49 units per square kilometre | 33.4 units per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 115.88 units per square kilometre | 153.3 units per square kilometre | 37.42 units per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 164.28 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 25.34 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 4th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.