Aruba vs Macao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Aruba
138.94 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Macao
116.06 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Aruba rank
4th
Macao rank
6th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Macao
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 138.94 units per square kilometre against 116.06 units per square kilometre in Macao, a difference of 22.88 units per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.2 times Macao's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 4th and Macao ranks 6th of 207 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 2,837 units per square kilometre 43.94 units per square kilometre 2,793 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3,222 units per square kilometre 98.13 units per square kilometre 3,123 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 1,996 units per square kilometre 216.16 units per square kilometre 1,780 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 1,597 units per square kilometre 366.78 units per square kilometre 1,231 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 1,643 units per square kilometre 343.69 units per square kilometre 1,299 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 436.09 units per square kilometre 126.15 units per square kilometre 309.94 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 115.88 units per square kilometre 113.95 units per square kilometre 1.94 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Aruba or Macao?
Aruba, at 138.94 units per square kilometre against 116.06 units per square kilometre in Macao as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Aruba and Macao?
22.88 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Macao?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Aruba and Macao rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 4th and Macao ranks 6th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Macao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/macao-sar-china/">Aruba vs Macao: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.